Wednesday 13 February 2013

Photography

During the last days Art & Aesthetics class, we discussed the topic of photography as an art and took at look at its history. We learned about camera obscura, digital photography, and touched on several well known photographic artists. However, the question given out was, "do you think photography is an art? Everyone takes photographs, so are we all artists?"
First off, photography is both an art and a science. Referring to the mechanics of it, its about the way images were made on a photosensitive surface by light that passes through a lens, the chemical changes that occurred in the film so that images were recorded, etc. The artistic aspect is more the photographer's choices; which films, which lens, how to manipulate the lighting, etc. As for the idea of photography as an art, early photographers felt that for photography to be an art it had to look like art. To achieve this, they employed darkroom techniques, tricks and manipulation that created photos that looked staged and imitative of sentimental, moralistic paintings. Photographers eventually began to think that photographic art should be more direct, non manipulated and sharply focused. Throughout history, the perspectives on photography have drastically changed bringing forth several photographic art forms such as photograms, photojournalism, documentary photography, studio photography, etc.
<http://writinghistory.blogspot.ca/2007/12/32-cameras.html>
My personal opinion would be that photography is an art depending on how the photographer wants to use the camera and the photo. I don't believe that a picture taken of something to show off whats in the picture can necessarily be called art. I think that in order to call it art, the photographer has to make decisions in the process of taking the picture rather than just clicking a button. However, without knowing if the picture was planned, it is up to the viewer to decide whether or not it is art. In my opinion, all forms of photography can produce art and theres a certain skill level required with a camera in order to create a piece of art. Not everyone can be considered an artist because they simply pressed a button, that would only insult those that actually take their time to produce artwork using this technology. Even after a course on photography, I would not consider myself to be a photographic artist by any means as there is so much I can learn and do better, but that does not mean that I cannot take a nice picture once in a while.
<http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-pictures-that-shaped-america.php/migrant-mother-famous-photographs-dorothea-lange>

Wednesday 6 February 2013

Drawings & Paintings

During the last class we discussed what drawings & painting were; a visual representation of an object or a scene on a flat surface. We briefly went over iconography (picture writing) and style, which is the difference between one picture and another is primarily the technique of execution. Artistic styles were discussed in terms of the different time periods:
-Renaissance (1300-1600AD)
-Baroque (1600-1700 AD)
-Rococo (1700-1750)
-Romanticism (1780-1860)
-Realism (1850-1900)
-Impressionism (1862-1886)
-Post-Impressionism (1880-1905)
-Cubism (1908-1914)
-Surrealism (1920-1940)
-Abstract Expressionism (1946-1955)
-Hard Edge (1958-1970)
-Pop Art (1960-1970)


<http://duckmarx.blogspot.ca/2011/02/art-history-timeline.html>

The goal of this particular post is to discuss an artistic style (time period) that you particularly like and explain what it is that intrigues you about the time period and style. Who is your favorite artist of this time period and why?
I find most interest in the artistic style/time period Romanticism. This style was formed through inspiration from revived interest in medieval tales called romances and nature worship. The subjects were usually that of legends, nature, violence and exotica with the compositional use of diagonals. I find this time period most intriguing because artists attempted to take images and ideas that they had never seen with their own eyes and portray them in a believable and realistic way. The art style resembled that of realism without the painted world being personally experienced and having more unimaginable subjects in the sense they were made through the creativity of the mind rather than the practicality of the eyes.
My favorite artist of this time period would probably be Theodore Gericault simply for his piece "Raft of the Medusa" done in 1819. I love the imagery and emotion shown in this painting, how the pain, suffering and desperation of the men aboard the raft is almost tangible as you look at the work. I also like the way the piece was composed, the use of diagonals and lighting, and how something that Gericault had never seen could be portrayed so realistically.

<http://pictify.com/29900/raft-of-the-medusa-by-theodore-gericault>